Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
An Example with Gender Differences
  • It is widely believed that males and females have very different drug/alcohol use patterns, histories and problems.
8
Gender Differences?
9
Did You Know?
  •  Among substance abusers entering   treatment, divided  by gender, differences in substance use variables are the least impressive.
  • More impressive are differences in Lifetime and Past 30 days data - personal health and social functioning variables.
10
Gender Differences
11
Gender Differences
12
"Compared to What?"
  • Compared to What?
    • What if you didn’t treat?
    • What if clients are not motivated?
13

No Treatment
  •  Tracking HIV seroconversion rates among 2 groups of heroin users
14
 
15
Role of Motivation
  • IV Drug Users Seeking HIV Testing


  • Pregnant Cocaine Users in Prenatal Care
16
  Un-Motivated Drug Users
  • Booth et al. University of Denver
    • 4,000 IV Drug Users in 15 cities
    • Seeking HIV testing - Not Treatment
  • Randomly assigned to:
    • HIV Testing Only
    • HIV Testing PLUS MET Counseling
  • Six Month Follow-Up Results
17
Drug Injection at Six Months
  • HIV Testing Only


  • 45%
  • HIV Test + MET


  • *20%
18
"HIV Testing Only"
  • HIV Testing Only


  • 11%
  • HIV Test + MET


  • 42%
19
Arrest Rate at Six Months
  • HIV Testing Only


  • 24%
  • HIV Test + MET


  • 14%
20
UNMOTIVATED DRUG USERS
  • Svikis et al.  Johns Hopkins                                           146 Cocaine Abusing, Pregnant Women
  • Seeking Pre-Natal Care - Not Treatment
  • 100 Received - 1-Week Residential Tx.
  • 46 Received -  Standard Pre-Natal Care
  • Costs and Complications of Delivery
21
Cocaine in Urine at Delivery
  • 46 Control Women


  • 63%
  • 100 Treated Women


  • 37%
22
NICU Stay and Costs
  • 46 Control Women


  • 39 days


  • $46,700
  • 100 Treated Women


  • 7 days


  • *$14,500
23
 
24
 
25
The Treatment System
  •   1975 1990 2004
26
Change Over Time: 1996-2005
Criminal Justice System Involvement
27
Heroin:  Percent Injecting
By Age Group * Over Time
28
Percent Injecting Heroin: 17-25 Year Olds
29
% Repeat Treatment Receivers
30
% of Patients on Medical Assistance?
31
 
32
OxyContin® work
  • OxyContin®, the brand name of a time-release prescription opioid has a similar active ingredient found in several other prescription (Rx) opioids and in heroin.


  • However, the media portrays users of OxyContin® as being more “drug naïve”, younger and more educated than individuals using other opioids such as heroin.
33
        Media Stereotypes
  • Rx opioid User
    • Younger
    • White
    • Higher SES
    • Drug naïve
34
       Media Stereotypes
35
   Significant Differences
  • Heroin users:


  • Were older & more likely to be unemployed, male, and non-white
  • Had significantly fewer family problems
  • Had longer periods of cocaine and amphetamine use
  • Had higher employment and drug composite scores
36
   Significant Differences
  • Prescription opioid users:


  • Were younger & more likely to be white and  employed full-time
  • Had more medical hospitalizations and more family problems
  • Were more likely to be awaiting legal charges
  • Had longer histories of alcohol, sedative, and cannabis use
37
Amphetamine Data
38
Amphetamine Data
39
Amphetamine Data – Percent Using
40
How To Get There…
  • Given the overwhelming burden of current “Paperwork” demands
41
Reporting Demands or “Paperwork”
  • Federal – TEDS, NOMS, Grant specific, etc.
  • State licensure requirements
  • City  or Single County agency requirements
  • JCAHO, CARF, other accrediting requirements
  • Status updates EAP, employer, welfare, child protective services, court system or probation status updates


42
 
43
 
44
 
45
 
46
Purpose of collecting standardized data
  • Standardize and simplify the information gathered at treatment intake
  • To be able to give a unified and comparable  picture of people coming into treatment
  • Quickly gather questions of current interest (Changes since 9/11, treatments needs after Katrina)
  • AND to inform program, county and state directors
47
An example of non-standardized reporting
  • Blood Pressure
  • Nurse 1 – It’s getting better (better than what??)
  • Nurse 2 – It’s much lower than before (too low??)
  • Nurse 3 – The patient is in denial (???)
  • Nurse 4 – The patient is non-compliant, lets not treat him until he’s really ready (malpractice?)
48
An example of standardized reporting
  • Blood Pressure
  • Nurse 1 – It’s 120/80
  • Nurse 2 – It’s 116/78
  • Nurse 3 – It’s 122/82
  • Nurse 4 – The patient is non-compliant, lets not treat him until he’s really ready (malpractice?)
49
 
50
 
51
 
52
"The ASI has been studied..."
53
"The ASI interview produces reliable..."
54
"The ASI can be collected..."
55
Reason # 7
56
Reason # 6
57
Reason # 5
58
Reason # 4
59
Reason # 3
60
Reason # 2
61
 
62
    Program “Turnover”
  • 8 % had closed altogether
  • 7 % had changed service operation
  • RESULT – 15% no longer providing SA Treatment
63
"28%"
  • 28% Were NOT Working Full Time


  •   Who is our Director?
64
"How do they spend their..."
    • How do they spend their day?
    • 3 - 4 Hours – Group Counseling
    • 1 - 2 Hours – Individual incl Intakes
    • 2 - 3 Hours – “Paperwork”
65
 Intake/Admission Process:
    • 30% only collect information mandated by city, state, federal regulations.
    • ASI was most used assessment (35%)
    • 15 – 20% Don’t Do Assessment
  • No Perceived Value for Assessment
    • “Simply Paperwork” -  Not Related to Treatment Plan or Services Delivered
66
Reason # 1
67
 
68
 
69
Background
  • Wrap-Around social services have been shown to improve treatment outcomes.   But……


  • Identifying problems and finding “wrap-around” services can be time-consuming and costly for counselors.
70
ASI and Resource Guide
  • We developed a computer assisted assessment system and  resource guide (RG).
  • The RG provided information from agencies that provided free or low-cost services in Philadelphia.
71
Findings
72
              Hypothesis 1
    • Patients whose counselors
    • receive the EA Training
    • will receive Treatment
    • Plans that better match
    • their problems identified
    • at admission.
73
   % Matched: ASI to TCP
74
               Hypothesis 2
    • Patients whose counselors
    • receive the EA Training
    • will receive more
    • services
75
Number of Services Received
76
               Hypothesis 3
    • Patients whose counselors
    • receive the EA Training
    • will receive Treatment
    • Services that better
    • match their problems
    • identified at admission.
77
% Matched: ASI to Services Received
78
Hypothesis 4
    • Patients whose counselors
    • receive the EA Training
    • will remain in treatment longer and be more likely to complete treatment.

79
Percent Retained at 45 Days
80
Percent Retained at 90 Days
81
Percent Completed
82